NASDAQCommunication ServicesElectronic Gaming & MultimediaSnapshot 2026-07-07
Reading TTWO? This analysis is rebuilt every market day. Get it tracked free. No credit card.
Track TTWO free→QuarterlyIQ Insights · TTWO
Price, fair value, and the multiples that frame it on the same time axis. Scroll over the price chart to zoom.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots inline.
A consensus fair price across 7 valuation methods, at three horizons. Current price $257.79. As of 2026-07-08. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Below average on quality vs scored peers
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
We take the 12-month fair value above and grade our own number — how the market prices this name versus what we'd justify, and where the two diverge.
At $258 the market pays 66× p/e — above the 24× p/e peer median but in line with its own 58× history. That premium reflects a durable franchise our peer-anchored $215 fair value understates; treat the 'expensive vs peers' read with low confidence. Analysts target $280–$290. Note: our $215 fair value sits below the entire analyst range ($280–$290). The flat-multiple read looks rich, but earnings are inflecting up — trailing growth is accelerating and forward estimates confirm — so we've softened our read rather than brand an accelerating name expensive. Not investment advice.
$280.00 – $290.00 (median $287.00) · 5 analysts · as of 2026-07-07
One valuation read at a 12-month horizon, plus how price compares to peers and the company's own history.
No fragility gates fired. Regime (Mania) does not concentrate fragility.
For similar setups historically (n=20,154): about 33% saw a 20%+ drawdown, and roughly 76% of those did not recover within the year. These are historical base rates for the cohort, not a forecast of this stock.
Looks more expensive than peers.
Richer than its own typical valuation.
Trailing four: 2025-Q3, 2026-Q1, 2026-Q2, 2026-Q3
Score 100 = cheapest in the cohort, 0 = richest. Bars are filled left-to-right based on the peer-relative score (or PEG/self-history where shown).
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.
Each method's implied share price per horizon. Provisional rows use a projected (historical-CAGR) growth input rather than analyst or management guidance.
| Method | Horizon | Est. price | Multiple | Per-share input | EPS source | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| analyst target | 12M | $287.00 | — | — | Analyst | high |
| Peer P/FCF | 12M | $39.10 | 16.1 | 2.43 | TTM | high |
| Peer P/E | 12M | $92.63 | 23.6 | 3.92 | TTM | high |
| Peer P/S | 12M | $43.21 | 1.2 | 35.98 | TTM | high |
| PEG | 12M | $32.98 | 8.4 | 3.92 | TTM | high |
| Own P/E history | 12M | $231.65 | 59.1 | 3.92 | TTM | high |
| triangulated | 12M | $100.74 | 23.6 | 4.26 | Triangulated | high |
| Peer P/E | 3Y | $140.88 | 23.6 | 5.96 | Analyst | low |
| Peer P/S | 3Y | $71.83 | 1.2 | 59.82 | guidance | low |
| PEG | 3Y | $50.15 | 8.4 | 5.96 | Analyst | low |
| Own P/E history | 3Y | $352.31 | 59.1 | 5.96 | Analyst | low |
| Peer P/E | 5Y | $186.32 | 23.6 | 7.88 | Analyst | medium |
| Peer P/S | 5Y | $94.99 | 1.2 | 79.11 | guidance | medium |
| PEG | 5Y | $66.33 | 8.4 | 7.88 | Analyst | medium |
| Own P/E history | 5Y | $465.93 | 59.1 | 7.88 | Analyst | medium |
A “consensus-then vs. actual-now” overlay is on the way — what our valuation estimate said on a past date versus where the price actually landed.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
