Lazard Inc (LAZ)
NYSEFinancialsFinancial - Capital MarketsSnapshot 2026-09-04
NYSEFinancialsFinancial - Capital MarketsSnapshot 2026-09-04
Research Workspace
Put LAZ beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
Industries move in repeating boom-and-bust cycles. This shows where this stock’s industry sits in that cycle, stage by stage (recovery → expansion → supercycle → steady → deceleration → contraction), from its fundamentals (orders, revenue, capital spending), not the stock’s price.
A booming industry is a tailwind for the names in it; a contracting one is a headwind. Companies in the same industry tend to rise and fall together with the cycle, the way a tide lifts and lowers every boat in the harbor at once, so a large part of a stock’s swing can come from where its industry sits rather than from the company itself. It’s context for reading the company’s results, not a buy/sell call. Full explanation →
Investment Banking & Brokerage is in expansion. Describes the industry's cycle state, not a call on this stock.
The stage band shows the industry’s cycle over the chart’s timeline (each color a stage); a ▼ marks a quarter its growth inflected down — amber is an unconfirmed watch, red is confirmed the next quarter. Use “Overlay cycle on chart” to tint the price chart by stage. The industry’s fundamentals, not a signal on this stock.
Primary pillar broken — Improve cash from operating activities toward positive levels: OCF -219.3M vs >0 target.
View ThesisRevenue growth is slowing — up about 6% over the past year and decelerating.
View GrowthMiddle-of-the-pack quality for its industry.
View QualityManagement screens strong on capital allocation, margins, the balance sheet.
View ManagementExpectations look reasonable — what the market is pricing in sits in line with or below what analysts forecast.
View ValuationThis stock is volatile — it swings about 2% on a typical day and fell roughly 31% in its worst 12-month stretch.
View RiskLazard's growth in asset management must continue to justify its current valuation. Revenue growth has been steady, but the latest quarter missed expectations, with a 71% earnings surprise. It trades at 24× P/E versus a 21× peer median, indicating that expectations look modest compared to our view. The primary risk is the need to improve cash from operating activities, which is currently negative at -219.3 million. Peer multiples imply a price roughly in line with where it trades. Our read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-09-04. LAZ is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 10 analysts currently covering LAZ (as of Sep 2026).
Based on 3 Wall Street analysts offering 12-month price targets for LAZ in the last 4 months.
Continue this research
Compare LAZ with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Free account required to save the handoff. No credit card.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAZ Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 12 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-09-04. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Investment Banking & Brokerage — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Compare the value case
Put LAZ next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Advances: Complete strategic acquisitions
Expansion aligns with strategic acquisition growth objective.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-09-04. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
Current $45.00
The last 12 months of price, then the range of analyst 12-month targets from today’s $45.00.
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Top 10% on quality vs scored peers
Direction of the business behind the multiple. Bands are backend reads; trailing-12-month basis.

Advances: Grow Asset Management business and AUM
Increase in AUM supports growth objective.

Advances: Complete strategic acquisitions
Strengthens growth strategy through strategic acquisition expertise.

Advances: Grow Asset Management business and AUM
Beating peers enhances AUM growth potential.

Advances: Grow Asset Management business and AUM
New executives enhance leadership for Asset Management growth.

Advances: Grow Asset Management business and AUM
Talent acquisition boosts Asset Management capabilities and AUM growth.

Threatens: Complete strategic acquisitions
PE deal shortfall impacts strategic acquisition goals.

Threatens: Improve cash from operating activities
Earnings drop threatens cash from operating activities objective.