GREENIDGE GENERATION HOLDINGS INC (GREE)
NASDAQFinancialsFinancial - Capital MarketsSnapshot 2026-09-04
NASDAQFinancialsFinancial - Capital MarketsSnapshot 2026-09-04
Research Workspace
Put GREE beside peers and holdings, graph the same metric, and keep your notes with the evidence.
Daily closes. Earnings/event dots are placed inline.
The reason to own it still holds.
View ThesisManagement screens weak on capital allocation, earnings delivery, the balance sheet.
View ManagementExpectations look reasonable — what the market is pricing in sits in line with or below what analysts forecast.
View ValuationThis stock is highly volatile — it swings about 3% on a typical day and fell roughly 54% in its worst 12-month stretch.
View RiskGREE's growth relies on improving financial performance and sector momentum. Recent financial performance sits well below its industry cohort, indicating potential for recovery. GREE trades at 0.6× P/S versus a 2.6× peer median, suggesting modest expectations are priced in. The next-quarter miss probability is 36%, indicating risk if guidance is cut. Peer multiples imply a price about 0.2% above where it trades. This read is provisional.
Trailing returns as of 2026-08-20. GREE is total return (includes dividends); the S&P 500 benchmark is price return (the index excludes dividends).
Based on 1 analyst currently covering GREE (as of Jul 2026).
Analyst ratings and price targets are third-party Wall Street estimates, not QuarterlyIQ’s view. Not investment advice.
Continue this research
Compare GREE with peers and holdings, graph the same reported metric, keep your questions beside the evidence, and return when the facts change.
Free account required to save the handoff. No credit card.
| Compare | Company | Living FV | P/E | Revenue % | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GREE Selected company | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Peer Add a competitor | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review | |
| Holding Compare a holding | Graph | Compare | Trend | Review |
Selected metric trend
Quarterly · checked companies · value or % of revenue
A consensus fair price across 0 valuation methods, at three horizons. As of 2026-09-04. Estimates are diagnostics, not price targets. Short-horizon estimates are close to coin-flips, so confidence is a method-agreement read, not a prediction.
Today's peer multiple on trailing earnings, with no growth credited. This is the headline read.
Adds projected growth, so it leans optimistic by design. Read it as upside context, not a base case.
A price-focused, side-by-side fair-value read versus Investment Banking & Brokerage — fair value, gap to price, and forward P/E.
Compare the value case
Put GREE next to peers and holdings, compare Living FV and multiples, then graph the driver behind the difference.
Advances: Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement
Renaming and funding align with growth strategy in AI/HPC.
Not investment advice. Scores describe historical and current data; they are not forecasts of future returns. Consult a licensed advisor before making investment decisions.
End-of-day figures as of 2026-08-20. EPS is implied from price ÷ P/E. Not investment advice.
A long-thesis check that carries the widest uncertainty of the three horizons.
Bottom 25% on quality vs scored peers
TTM earnings are negative. P/E-based methods drop out and the estimate leans on sales- and cash-flow-based methods. A data condition, not a forward call.